Skip to main content

Welcome and thank you for visiting our Website. For any suggestions, updates, additions or errors, please contact Amede Kyubwa, MA, MPA @

SACPROS     Magazine     Find a Doctor     EMERGENCY     HOSPITALS     Providers     GROUPS     AOD     CLINICS     JOBS     PROFESSIONALS     HOUSING     OTHER     WHY?      
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
...

A Glossary of Old Football Position Names: Centre-Half, Wing-Half, Inside Forward, Outside Right and What They Mean in Modern Football

Old football position names such as centre-half, wing-half, inside forward and outside right come from the formations of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and many still survive in commentary, club histories and record books. Modern player profiles on RubiScore use current labels, so knowing how the old ones map onto today's roles helps when reading historical lineups and records.

This glossary groups the old terms by the formation that produced them, explains what each player actually did, and links each label to its modern equivalent. It also shows why some names changed meaning over time. Current player positions, lineups and formations can be checked at https://rubiscore.com, alongside the historical records that still use the older vocabulary.

Where the Old Names Come From

For several decades the standard shape was the 2-3-5, often called the pyramid: a goalkeeper, two backs, three half-backs and five forwards. Most of the classic position names describe a slot in that shape. When Arsenal manager Herbert Chapman reshaped his team after the 1925 change to the offside law, which reduced the number of defenders needed to keep an attacker onside from three to two, the WM formation moved several of those slots without renaming them. That is why a label can survive while the job behind it changes.

The Back Line

  • Back. In the 2-3-5, the two defenders were simply the backs, one on the right and one on the left. They defended the central area in front of goal rather than the flanks.
  • Full-back. The term separated the deepest defenders from the half-backs in front of them. It survived every later change and now describes the wide defenders in a back four, who cover the flanks and often attack. The modern full-back's job is very different from the original's, even though the name is the same.
  • Custodian. An old newspaper word for the goalkeeper, still seen in historical match reports.

The Half-Back Line

  • Half-back. Any of the three players between the backs and the forwards. The half-back line was the midfield of its time, responsible for winning the ball and feeding the forwards.
  • Right half and left half (wing-halves). The two outer half-backs. In the 2-3-5 they marked the opposing wingers and supported their own. After the WM was introduced, the wing-halves moved inside to form a pair in central midfield. Their closest modern equivalents are the central or defensive midfielders in a double pivot.
  • Centre-half. The middle of the three half-backs, and in the pyramid the team's pivot: he defended, distributed and often directed play. In the WM, the centre-half dropped between the two backs to mark the opposing centre-forward, becoming a third defender sometimes called the stopper centre-half. In English usage the name stayed with the defensive role, which is why centre-half is still a synonym for centre-back.

The centre-half shows how a label can travel. In much of South America the central midfield role did not move back in the same way, and in Argentina the defensive midfielder is still commonly known as the "cinco", the number five, after the shirt worn by the old centre-half.

The Forward Line

  • Outside right and outside left. The two wide forwards, playing close to the touchline and supplying crosses. Their modern equivalents are wingers, although today's wide players often cut inside, which the old outside forwards rarely did.
  • Inside right and inside left. The two forwards either side of the centre-forward. In the 2-3-5 they were goalscorers and creators in roughly equal measure. In the WM they dropped deeper to link midfield and attack. They are the ancestors of the modern attacking midfielder, the number eight who arrives late in the box and the number ten who plays between the lines.
  • Inside forward. The collective name for the two inside players. The Italian term "mezzala", meaning half-winger, comes from the same slot and now describes a central midfielder who drifts into the half-space.
  • Centre-forward. The central striker, the one name that has kept nearly the same meaning from the pyramid to the present.

Terms From the Transition Years

As formations evolved through the middle of the twentieth century, new labels appeared to describe players who did not fit the old slots.

  • Stopper. A centre-half whose main job was to mark the opposing centre-forward closely. The term is still used for an aggressive, front-foot centre-back.
  • Sweeper. A free defender playing behind the back line to cover. Later refined into the libero, who also stepped forward with the ball.
  • Deep-lying centre-forward. A centre-forward who dropped into midfield instead of staying high. Hungary's Nándor Hidegkuti in the team that beat England 6-3 at Wembley in 1953 is the most cited example, and the idea is a direct ancestor of the modern false nine.
  • Withdrawn inside forward. An inside forward who played even deeper, close to a modern playmaker.

Old Names and Their Modern Equivalents

A quick reference for translating historical lineups:

  • Back → central defender in a two-man defence, closer to a modern centre-back than a full-back
  • Full-back → full-back, with a far more attacking job today
  • Wing-half (right half, left half) → central or defensive midfielder, often in a pair
  • Centre-half (pyramid era) → central midfield pivot, close to a deep-lying playmaker
  • Centre-half (WM onwards) → centre-back
  • Inside forward (inside right, inside left) → attacking midfielder, number eight or number ten
  • Outside right, outside left → winger
  • Centre-forward → striker
  • Deep-lying centre-forward → false nine

These are approximations. Each old position bundled duties that modern football splits between roles, and each modern role adds duties, such as pressing, that the old positions did not ask for.

How the Old Names Connect to Shirt Numbers

The traditional numbering followed the pyramid from right to left and back to front. The goalkeeper wore one, the backs two and three, the half-backs four, five and six, and the forwards seven to eleven, from outside right to outside left with the centre-forward in nine. This is why the number five is linked to centre-halves in England and to defensive midfielders in Argentina, and why ten is linked to the inside-left slot that became the creative attacking role.

Why the Vocabulary Matters for Data

Old position names are more than history. They affect how records and data are read.

  • Historical records. Older line-ups and record books list players by slot, such as inside left. Assigning a modern position to those players involves interpretation, and different databases may make different choices.
  • Positional comparisons across eras. A goalscoring record for an inside forward is not directly comparable with one for a modern midfielder, because the role carried a larger share of the team's scoring.
  • Ambiguous labels. The same word can mean different things. Centre-half is a defender in modern English commentary but described a midfielder in the pyramid era.
  • Language differences. Labels such as cinco, mezzala or volante carry their own histories and do not always map neatly onto English terms.

When a career record lists a player as an inside forward, the safest reading is a creative attacking player with substantial scoring responsibility, not simply a midfielder. RubiScore player profiles use modern position labels, so comparing a historical record with a current one starts with translating the old slot into the closest modern role.

A Worked Example: Reading an Old Line-Up

Imagine a match report from the early 1950s that lists a team in the traditional order: goalkeeper; right back, left back; right half, centre-half, left half; outside right, inside right, centre-forward, inside left, outside left. If the team played the WM, the shape on the pitch was not the 2-3-5 the list suggests.

The centre-half would have played between the two backs as a third central defender. The two wing-halves would have formed a central midfield pair. The two inside forwards would have played slightly behind the front three, linking play, while the outside forwards stayed wide and the centre-forward led the line. Translated into modern notation, the list describes something close to a 3-2-2-3. Reading the list literally, as five forwards and three midfielders, would overstate the team's attacking numbers and misplace almost every player.

How the Terms Relate

The glossary forms a single chain. The pyramid created the slots, the WM moved them, and later systems added labels for players who no longer fitted any slot. Centre-half travelled from midfield to defence, wing-halves moved inside to become central midfielders, inside forwards dropped deeper to become attacking midfielders, and outside forwards became wingers. Only the centre-forward kept roughly the same job throughout. Reading the old names as positions in a specific formation, rather than as fixed jobs, is the key to translating them.